Bobby From ‘Queer Eye’ Is In A Twitter Feud With Meghan McCain! Look! – Perez Hilton

Meghan McCain is supposed to be the republican voice on The View .

But being conservative doesn’t have to mean being like Donald Trump — you know, always playing the main victims, establishing confusion with whataboutism, and using your own” alternative facts .”

And regrettably that’s what the host has been doing WAY too much of lately, and she ultimately get busted on it this week — by one of the stars of Queer Eye !

Video: Queer Eye Season 3 Trailer

During an interview segment with Democratic presidential wannabe Jay Inslee on Monday, Meghan started after an apparent pet peeve of hers: politicians talking about plans to save the world from man-made climate change.

Here’s the video of that πŸ˜› TAGEND

We’ll save you the time and some of the thwarting of watching; basically it was downed like this πŸ˜› TAGEND

After saying climate change wasn’t even in her top 30 concerns when voting, she also quoted some statistics about the Light-green New Deal πŸ˜› TAGEND

” It would expense $93 trillion or to every person in this room, $600,000 per each of your households. Do you think that project is practical or have you endorsed it or do you have another option? Because when I hear that the average American is going to have to invest $600,000 for a New Green Deal you can understand how people like me don’t think that’s logical .”

Oof, where to begin?

While investment into initiatives to move away from fossil fuels is always going to be costly, the committee is also will pay off with TONS of new jobs in growing industries. Not to mention IT WILL SAVE THE PLANET WE ALL HAVE TO LIVE ON!

Oh, and likewise those amounts are B.S .! We can’t even find studies that approach that high-pitched! Well, Inslee didn’t proceed that far. He simply told her the above figures were inaccurate πŸ˜› TAGEND

” Well, this is a lot like the extinction panels you heard about in Obamacare. We don’t have demise panels and we don’t have $600,000 rates .”

Then Meghan came back with more talking points πŸ˜› TAGEND

” We’re is speaking to $51 trillion, the elimination of planes, the elimination of kine, a railway , no airplanes, I guess nobody can go to Hawaii anymore. It doesn’t sound rational to me .”

Finally Inslee said with more politesses than we would have been able to muster πŸ˜› TAGEND

” It doesn’t sound rational because those are the things that Donald Trump said. We are not going to eliminate autoes. We are not going to eliminate trains. We’re going to have what I have in my driveway today which is a blue-blooded GM Bolt established in Michigan with American workers .”

The important degree about Meghan’s presentation?

She simply spewed talking phases at the man. She didn’t listen to what he had to say. She wasn’t interested in learning, she was interested in furthering her message.

That’s what Bobby Berk couldn’t let her get away with. He took to Twitter after watching the exchange to write πŸ˜› TAGEND

Today, u @MeghanMcCain were everything incorrect w/ journalism. Presented w/ the facts of the case that u were quoting incorrect data abt the #GreenNewDeal u continued 2 “re saying it”. Why perpetuate the #fakenews difficulty we have in this country? Perhaps it’s day 2 take your lies2 @FoxNews& leave @TheView

She answered πŸ˜› TAGEND

” Hey Bobby –

1. I am NOT a journalist, it makes me sad and intimidated so many people baffle this. I am a republican political commentator- I represent the most conservative point of view in the country, which is my job every day on The View….

2. I am and have been a big fan of gay eye and hope you’re okay with me continuing to be a fan of the show.

3. Instead of getting in a snark combat on twitter, I welcome any opportunity to discuss with you why I think the dark-green new deal is illogical and dangerous in person. xo”

Not a columnist? That’s your contention ?? You are on Tv every day giving people datum. You may not be a journalist, but your job is one aspect of their theirs, and that’s communicating information to the masses.

No one is asking you to dig up tales, to flog wall street and find sources — but you have an obligation to do some homework about whatever it is you’re speaking on.

And Bobby wasn’t OK with her defence of simply repping a “point of view.” He shot back πŸ˜› TAGEND

” Blatant lies are not a point of view honey! There are just a way to rile the base just like Trump does. I used to have a lot of respect for you and not lump you on with the likes of him, but “youre ever” literally reiterating his lies and are growing best available”


Meghan hit back by withdrawing her fandom, saying πŸ˜› TAGEND

” That is not what I was doing, I was pointing out the financial implications an average American would feel if the dark-green new deal were enacted- but clearly I won’t be changing your mind. I also guess I won’t be watching gay eye anymore. Have a nice day .”

Again, Meghan was absolutely not doing that.

At best she is displaying a fundamental absence of be informed about economics, at worst she’s being intellectually dishonest.

Here’s a clear lesson of what she’s doing: many of the costs of proposed programs, like universal health care, are presented by their adversaries simply by their cost, as if it’s going to cost this is something that MORE, when in fact that cost projection is smaller than that of NOT implementing it.

For instance, research studies been identified Democratic medicare for all design would expenditure Americans $7.35 trillion a year by 2031! That seems atrociously expensive! Until you likewise point out under our present healthcare structure the cost will by $7.61 trillion. Insure, the study actually encountered the programme would save millions of dollars, but if you twist the info simply the right way … and on TV of thousands of viewers?

Not hard to do the math on that…


And saying over and over” the average American will have to pay X” suggests someone who is in the middle can expect that rate. Even if those numbers were anywhere near accurate, the cost to the “average”( median) American wouldn’t come close to the “average”( signify) cost.

The thing about the top 1% having more wealth than the bottom 90% means they are obviously going to have to pay in path, WAY more. For those who think everyone should pay the same, well — tough. The world can’t live that way.

Literally. The world cannot live without specifying climate change.

[ Image via Adriana M. Barraza/ WENN/ The View/ YouTube .]

Read more: https :// bobby-berk-meghan-mccain-twitter-feud /

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *